Manual handoffs between tools
Teams copy, export, reformat, and reconcile the same information across email, spreadsheets, SaaS tools, and internal systems.
REMOTE TECHNICAL PARTNER
AI workflow automation and technical operations support for small teams.
I help US and worldwide teams remove workflow friction with senior technical execution, async-first collaboration, and scoped interventions that stay small enough to prove useful quickly.
See how remote work runsEurope-based, English-speaking, with international company experience and a practical cost advantage over senior US hiring overhead.
WHERE I HELP
The work usually starts where execution is leaking time.
It's not about buying a new tool or implementing a fancy workflow. It is about finding what keeps costing attention, then deciding whether it deserves automation, AI support, tweaks, a small internal system or just a better understanding from its users.
Workflows held together by reminders
Progress depends on follow-ups, status checks, and recurring manual coordination that should not require founder or senior team attention.
Fragile automations and scripts
A few shortcuts already exist, but nobody fully trusts them, owns them, or knows what will break when the process changes.
AI experiments without an operating model
The team has tried ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or internal prompts, but the useful cases have not become repeatable work.
SERVICE SURFACE
A small senior lane, not a broad agency catalog.
Most useful engagements start with a workflow, a recurring loss of time, or a technical handoff that needs to be made simpler before anyone adds more tools.
Senior execution without US senior hiring overhead.
You get a founder-led technical partner for focused automation and operations work, without turning the first step into a large hiring or transformation program.
Automation diagnostics
I map the friction, check the tools already in place, and decide whether automation is worth the effort before building anything.
AI workflow implementation
I turn practical AI use cases into safer, repeatable workflows with human checks, clear inputs, and maintainable boundaries.
Lightweight internal tools
When the team needs a focused tool rather than another SaaS subscription, I build the smallest useful version first.
Technical operations support
I help unblock delivery workflows, technical handoffs, SRE-adjacent friction, and small systems that need senior judgment.
Online team workshops
For adoption topics, I keep training remote, practical, and tied to the workflows the team actually needs to use.
REMOTE MODEL
Async by default, meetings when they are worth it.
The operating model is built for cross-border work: fewer recurring meetings, clearer written decisions, and live time reserved for the moments that need it.
Written decisions before meeting volume.
Most work can move through concise notes, shared artifacts, clear checkpoints, and decisions that remain easy to inspect later.
Meetings when the subject needs them.
If a critical discussion requires a US-friendly slot, I can make myself available. Daily synchronous overlap is not the default operating model.
Sensitive data stays explicit.
Access, credentials, prompts, client data, and production systems are handled with clear boundaries before any implementation begins.
STARTING POINT
The first step is small on purpose.
Before implementation, we check whether the workflow has enough leverage to justify a diagnostic or a scoped mission.
Remote intro call
We use a short call to understand the workflow, the cost of the friction, and whether there is a real lever.
Go or no-go
If the topic is too small, too vague, or not worth automating, I say so before turning it into a project.
Diagnostic or scoped mission
When the subject is worth it, the next step stays narrow: diagnose, simplify, automate, or build the smallest useful tool.
Implementation with clear checks
Execution stays practical: written decisions, visible tradeoffs, simple validation, and no extra complexity without a reason.
FIT CHECK
Useful when the problem is concrete.
I am most useful when there is already a visible workflow, tool chain, delivery handoff, or AI use case that needs senior technical judgment.
Worth discussing
- Repetitive work across SaaS tools, spreadsheets, email, or internal systems.
- AI workflow ideas that need structure, safety, and actual team adoption.
- Technical operations friction that needs senior judgment without hiring a full-time senior US profile.
Better to avoid
- 24/7 synchronous staffing or production incident ownership.
- Large transformation programs without a concrete workflow to improve first.
- AI exploration that is disconnected from operations, delivery, or measurable work.
International context, practical execution.
I work in English, I have operated in international environments, and I have worked inside a Nasdaq-listed company context. The offer is still intentionally small: clarify the work, remove the friction, and only automate what earns its place.
FAQ
Before a first call.
Do you work with US companies?
Yes. The offer is designed for remote collaboration with US and worldwide teams. Work is async-first, with meetings scheduled when they are useful.
Do you work on US hours?
I do not sell daily US-hour staffing. For important meetings, kickoff sessions, or critical decisions, I can make myself available on the time slot the project needs.
Can you train a team remotely?
Yes. English-language training is handled as online workshops tied to real workflows, not generic AI or automation theory.
Can you work with sensitive data?
Only after the boundaries are clear. Access, credentials, client data, prompts, and production systems are discussed before implementation.
What if automation is not worth it?
Then I say it early. The point is to remove profitable friction, not to add automation because automation is available.
REMOTE INTRO
Start with the workflow, not with a big project.
In a short call, we check whether the topic deserves a diagnostic, a scoped automation mission, or no action at all.
Book a remote intro call